[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Energy giant E.ON confirms withdrawal of The Isles wind farm scheme near Sedgefield  

Credit:  Flossie Mainwaring-Taylor, Reporter (Newton Aycliffe & Sedgefield) | The Northern Echo | www.thenorthernecho.co.uk ~~

Energy giant E.ON has today (January 21) confirmed it has withdrawn its application for the controversial Isles wind farm in County Durham.

The company cited a number of reasons for pulling the plug on its plans for the 24-turbine development near Sedgefield and Newton Aycliffe – which it said had become “technically and economically” unviable.

Scaled back from 45 turbines in 2012, the proposed scheme would have resulted in the renewable energy site spread across two areas close to the A1 motorway.

A spokesperson for E.ON said: “During a detailed review of the project a number of long standing environmental and technical issues have been re-assessed.

“These include the long-standing objection from the Ministry of Defence, the high level of bird activity on the site, investor uncertainty and changes to Planning Law.

“While onshore wind remains one of the cheapest low carbon technologies available, the Isles Wind Farm project has been affected by a number of objections, since it was submitted to Durham County Council in April 2013 and is no longer technically or economically viable.”

The move to withdraw the application, which was revealed by The Northern Echo this morning, was met with delight by campaigners who have been fighting their cause for about six years.

Sue Fox, Bradbury resident and member of The Isles Community Turbine Action Campaign (Tictac), said: “We’ve had a really mixed bag of emotions – there is a lot of happiness and joy, but also an element of frustration that it’s taken so long when right at the beginning we said it was not a suitable area.

“The overriding emotion is pride because they underestimated the community. We learned everything we needed to and if we hadn’t done, they would have built it two years ago. We had the community behind us.”

She and other campaigners believe the Government’s cuts to energy subsidies had a ‘major’ role in the decision to withdraw.

MP for Sedgefield Phil Wilson, who has backed campaigners since the outset, welcomed what he called the “excellent news”.

“County Durham has a proud record for renewable energy,” he said. “We’ve done our bit in allowing wind farm developments in the county and I thought this particular wind farm was just a step too far.”

He said the main concern was the cumulative impact of wind farm developments in the county, adding he was not against such renewable energy sites.

Source:  Flossie Mainwaring-Taylor, Reporter (Newton Aycliffe & Sedgefield) | The Northern Echo | www.thenorthernecho.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.