LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Offshore wind energy hearing draws support for alternative energy, wildlife concerns 

Credit:  By Audrey Hudson | The Sun News | January 6, 2016 | www.myrtlebeachonline.com ~~

Developing wind energy offshore South Carolina’s coast will be a long and complicated project that could take as long as a decade, but if no private investors come forward to pay for the effort the entire process would be dead in the water.

That’s according to Brian Krevor, environmental protection specialist for the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. Krevor and nearly a dozen federal employees participated in a hearing Wednesday night in Murrells Inlet to explain to Grand Strand residents how the bureaucratic process will work.

“If no developer comes into the process, it just ends, but if a developer comes in and says they are interested in the Grand Strand, we go forward,” Krevor told The Sun News prior to the hearing.

There are no offshore wind facilities operating in federally controlled waters, however one operation near Massachusetts has a permit to move forward.

Four areas of interest are under examination for potential development off South Carolina’s shore. The largest is the Grand Strand region, which stretches about 885 nautical square miles.

Krevor said if there is strong interest in developing the Grand Strand region, this area would likely be broken up into several leases for more than one wind energy development. If the interest is strong, developers might have to compete for the leases at auction.

Many of the residents who attended the hearing had questions about the environmental impact of developing wind energy as well as the operating platforms and its affects on wildlife.

“The talk of bird fatalities is way overblown,” said Ian McLaren of Litchfield.

Another local said federal officials should better educate the public that cats are responsible for more bird deaths than onshore wind turbines.

Lee Hewitt with Garden City Reality was at the hearing to represent the concerns of 400 of their vacation homeowners.

“It could impact them and our business and the whole Grand Strand,” said Hewitt, who expressed concerns about the turbines’ proximity to Huntington State Park, which includes a bird sanctuary.

Residents seemed more concerned about ill effects on aquatic wildlife from seismic testing. According to Krevor, such exploration is “not as intense” as what is used to develop oil and gas.

Residents asked about the visibility of the turbines, which would be constructed 10 miles offshore.

Theoretically, Krevor said, the structures and lights can be seen onshore when built as far out as 24 nautical miles, however several factors can blur the turbines, including hazy and humid summer days.

The hearings are part of the 60-day comment period set in motion by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management after the potential leases were announced Nov. 23 along four South Carolina Outer Continental Shelf sites, including the Grand Strand, Cape Romain, Winyah and Charleston.

The federal agency is preparing to conduct studies to determine whether 1,200 nautical square miles of ocean off South Carolina’s coast should be leased for development. This public comment period is open until Jan. 25, and another meeting is scheduled for Thursday night from 6 p.m. until 8 p.m. at Boulineau’s in North Myrtle Beach.

Source:  By Audrey Hudson | The Sun News | January 6, 2016 | www.myrtlebeachonline.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky