LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Opponents hope to knock Grain Belt Express off track 

Credit:  Tony Reid | Pantagraph | January 2, 2016 | www.pantagraph.com ~~

DECATUR – The proposed Grain Belt Express power line project is still on the winning track, but its opponents refuse to be shunted out of the way.

Several landowners joined with the Illinois Farm Bureau to file a request asking state regulators to rehear their November decision to approve Illinois’ portion of the $2 billion transmission line. That request was rejected in December by those same regulators, the Illinois Commerce Commission, along with multiple other rehearing requests filed by other objectors.

The loud and persistent opponents are far from conceding defeat, however. They say the 780-mile line, 200 miles of which are set to pass over Pike, Scott, Greene, Macoupin, Montgomery, Christian, Shelby Cumberland and Clark counties in Illinois, is being rammed through over widespread objections.

The opponents say the line was approved on an expedited process normally reserved for utilities, and one that should not have been available to Grain Belt’s developers, Texas-based Clean Line Energy Partners.

Opponents also claim the 4,000-megawatt line will inconvenience farmers and landowners for the sake of a project that is too expensive anyway. Several opponents say they are now ready to take legal action through a court appeal; the Illinois Farm Bureau could not be reached for comment.

But Pike County Farm Bureau Executive Director Blake Roderick has been quoted as saying he thinks the issue will end up “in the courts under appeal.”

Other objectors have been more blunt in their assessments: “What we have learned through this process at the ICC is that the opposition (Clean Line) hopes the other will be tired of legal fees and quit; this will not happen,” wrote an opponent identified as “BG Farms” on the ICC web site. “Well, we are not done in Ilinois! The appeal process will be our next step.”

The Grain Belt Express line is designed to funnel wind-generated power from breezy western Kansas across three adjoining states to plug into the national power grid. Construction is due to start in 2017 and, in addition to Illinois, it’s also won approval from Kansas and Indiana state regulators. But Missouri power officials rejected the project in July, much to the delight of Illinois objectors who are backing their stand.

“Right now, I am ashamed to call Illinois home,” said one objector, Sheryl Slightom, writing on the ICC website. “We, the property owners, stand with Missouri and will continue the fight.”

But the Grain Belt line, now gearing up for a renewed effort to get approval in Missouri, also has plenty of friends and plenty of backers over the border in Illinois. Supporters range from unions to environmentalists: one group welcoming the construction jobs the line would bring and the other happy about the prospect of pollution-free green energy.

Clean Energy has said its new line will deliver a $700 million investment in Illinois and generate 1,500 jobs; it also says wind energy flowing through the wires will slash wholesale energy prices in Illinois by $750 million in its first five years of operation.

One supporter, Lynnley Wilson, wrote this comment on the ICC website: “This country must stay on target with new, clean, low-cost energy, and these projects provide that and a much-needed boost to the local economy … I support transmission projects that are being developed to bring low-cost wind energy to Illinois.”

Source:  Tony Reid | Pantagraph | January 2, 2016 | www.pantagraph.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky