[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Blame, don’t praise government for energy policy  

Credit:  Your View: Blame, don't praise government for energy policy | By Lee Nason | Dec. 11, 2015 | www.southcoasttoday.com ~~

Recently, The Standard-Times has published two editorials applauding the goals of the Paris climate talks and praising our federal government for controlling greenhouse gas emissions so effectively. The assumptions behind both these editorials are, in my view, deeply flawed.

We can all agree with the editors that it would be immoral to demand that Third World countries remain mired in poverty in order to curtail greenhouse gas emissions. But the proposed solution, to bribe them with American taxpayer money to keep their emissions under control, is unrealistic and, in some cases, counterproductive.

It is unrealistic because the United States, even with the financial help of the remainder of the developed world, cannot supply clean energy to the roughly 3 billion people in Asia and Africa who currently do not have it. At best, the governments getting the climate change compensation could only force their people to continue to live in energy-free destitution.

At worst, such a solution will often be counterproductive because we are handing the money over to typically unelected, corrupt, and/or authoritarian governments who will often simply use our money to keep themselves in power and further repress their own people and the promise of their own economies.

Consider that we would be giving money to the outrageously corrupt Nigerian government where 76 percent of the country’s oil revenues are stolen by government officials, the socialist Indian government that prohibits efficient supermarkets from operating in order to win votes from the caste of wasteful tiny store owners, the Maldivian government controlled by a military elite which illegally ousted its democratically elected president, the Bangladeshi government which actually kills people for blasphemy, the Indonesian government which already condones the third highest greenhouse gas emissions in the world, etc., etc.

In the second editorial, The Standard-Times accurately cites American reductions in greenhouse gas emissions but inexplicably gives the credit for this welcome change to government policies. In reality, the change has occurred in spite of government policies.

The reduction in emissions, as generally agreed, has been due to the substitution of less expensive lower-emission natural gas for high-emission coal and oil. But our federal government has done everything politically possible to curtail production of natural gas – slow-walking pipeline approvals, regulating a decades old (safe and largely environmentally harmless) fracking industry causing unnecessary cost increases, curtailing production on federal lands from 7,000 trillion btu in 2003 to about half that amount in 2014, and more.

Meanwhile, the federal government has squandered billions of taxpayer dollars on expensive solar and wind projects, often owned and operated by their donors and favored friends, which have frequently declared bankruptcy or, at best, produced marginal amounts of very expensive energy – the federal government reports that last year about 2 percent of our energy needs were met with solar and wind power.

I expect that both President Obama’s administration and the Editorial Board of the New Bedford Standard-Times have sincerely good intentions but, as we all have heard, the road to hell is paved with them.

Lee Nason lives in New Bedford.

Source:  Your View: Blame, don't praise government for energy policy | By Lee Nason | Dec. 11, 2015 | www.southcoasttoday.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.