[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Plans for Rame wind turbine visible from Plymouth Hoe rejected 

Credit:  Western Morning News | November 25, 2015 | www.westernmorningnews.co.uk ~~

Plans for a wind turbine which it was feared would ruin an iconic view from Plymouth Hoe have been thrown out.

Cornwall Council issued a notice of refusal for the Bridgemoor Wind Turbine proposed to be located North East of Freathy on the Rame Peninsula.

In rejecting the bid, the authority said the proposal did “not have the support of the affected community, and their concerns in respect of landscape harm cannot be fully addressed.”

The council also said: “The benefits of the proposal do not outweigh the unacceptable visual impact upon the surrounding landscape and near by Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty by reason of its scale, height, prominence in the landscape and rotating features.”

Residents, councillors and the Ministry of Defence had objected to the plans by Community Power Cornwall (CPC) and more than 80% of all comments registered online during the public consultation phase were in opposition.

Five local parish councils, including St John, Millbrook, Anthony, Maker with Rame and Sheviock, had warned of the “damaging cumulative impact” a wind turbine would have upon the area while the National Trust and the MoD defence estates safeguarding team also waded into the debate.

Linda Coles, of Sheviock Parish Council, commented: “The adverse impact on the both the landscape and amenity of residents is not outweighed by any positive effects, including the minimal contribution to energy and additional community income.”

The Cornwall Area of Natural Beauty (AONB) Unit added: “We object to the proposals for the following reasons on the basis that they will result in undue harm to the landscape character and natural beauty of the Cornwall AONB.”

In response, Neil Farrington, technical director at CCP, responded that the criticisms were “unjustified”.

He said: “We’ve gone through a thorough process in submitting this application,” he said.

“We’ve been clear, transparent, consulted with the public and completed assessments to prove this turbine will not effect any residential properties, bring planes and helicopters crashing down to earth, lead to the industrialisation of the peninsula or cause epilepsy.”

Source:  Western Morning News | November 25, 2015 | www.westernmorningnews.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky