[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Three thoughts: Blowin’ in the wind  

Credit:  The Kingston Reporter | Oct. 31, 2015 | kingston.wickedlocal.com ~~

1 Last week, the Kingston Board of Health changed the rules for the Independence wind turbine, located on leased town land overlooking Route 3. The original “abatement order,” enacted more than 24 months ago, required the turbine be shut down during specific times, but it also included restrictions based on the direction the wind was blowing.

We think board member David Kennedy pretty much summed up the absurdity of that when he noted, “I don’t know how a turbine developer can turn it off and then turn it back on when the wind changes.”

Eliminating wind direction as a consideration was an excellent move on the part of the board.

2 But the amount of time it has taken for residents who say the turbine negatively impacts their lives to get even this level of resolution is ridiculous.

Yes, the studies needed to be done, but the length of time it took to conduct them and respond to them was disrespectful to those claiming injury and sets a bad precedent for what is an appropriate response from the town to the concerns of its residents. Whatever the final decision of the board, the time it took to make it was unacceptable.

3 The real problem here, as we’ve written before, goes back to the foundation of turbine projects in Kingston and other communities across the state.

While the desire to address the very real need for alternative, renewable, green energy is praiseworthy, there was – and continues to be – a shortage of verifiable scientific information about the potential negative impact of wind turbines on those living near them.

That does not mean we should not embrace wind energy. It just means we owe residents (and property owners whose land values could be impacted by such development) a more informed and compassionate set of standards for where turbines can and should be located.

Source:  The Kingston Reporter | Oct. 31, 2015 | kingston.wickedlocal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.