LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Cell tower court ruling could affect wind farms in Oklahoma 

Credit:  October 22, 2015 | okenergytoday.com ~~

Two court rulings in favor of a Muskogee County resident who fought construction of a 250-foot cellphone tower and called it a nuisance is being described as a warning to the state’s wind energy industry, according to a report in the Journal Record.

A State Appeals court recently upheld a lower court ruling that the telecommunications tower built on property near Ken Laubenstein’s home was a nuisance. Whether it will be removed is another matter since BoDe Tower officials aren’t sure if they will ask the State Court of Civil Appeals to reconsider the case or take it to the State Supreme Court. Laubenstein filed suit in 2010 and won a favorable ruling in a 2013 trial before Muskogee County Associate District Judge Norman D. Thygesen who said the BoDe Tower had to be “removed.” He gave the company 60 days to bring it down, then stayed the order while the case went to the state appeals court.

But now some are wondering how the ruling might impact the state’s growing wind farms and possibly a lawsuit filed by landowners in Canadian and Kingfisher Counties against Apex Clean Energy Inc.

“It could be a shot across the bow for the wind industry,” said attorney Terry Stowers who leads the Coalition of Oklahoma Surface and Mineral Owners. He told the Journal Record the case could be translated in such a way that if a wind turbine’s ruled a nuisance, a judge could perhaps order it to be brought down.

Read full story in Journal Record.

Read Journal Record story

Source:  October 22, 2015 | okenergytoday.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky