LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Fayette Co. board decision clears way for turbines near Fairbank 

Credit:  Written by Brad Hanson, Multimedia Journalist | www.kwwl.com ~~

The Fayette County Zoning Board of Adjustment denied two appeals Tuesday night that clear the way for wind turbines to be built near Fairbank.

The City of Fairbank had filed an appeal, saying that the board had misinterpreted the ordinance about whether wind turbines could be built in an agriculture district.

The ordinance, which was written in 1972, has no clear reference to wind turbines as we know them today. So the issue at hand wasn’t whether the county was pro wind or not, but if they had made a legal interpretation of the ordinance.

The board voted 3-0, saying Zoning Administrator Katherine Miller had made a legal decision.

Bill Cowell, mayor of Fairbank, was disappointed by the decision.

“I understand it’s a legal issue,” he said. “As far as our opinion, we’re not happy about that, obviously. We want our city to grow, and the concern is that, how willing are new families going to be to move into the area, build a home, and build it in that area that the windmills are going to be clearly visible to them.”

Optimum Renewables is now clear to start construction on three 492 foot windmills, barring anymore appeals.

Miller says if the city does decide to appeal the board’s decision, it would then be heard at the district court level.

Cowell says he’s unsure if that’s the plan.

“We’ll discuss it at our city council meeting to decide if there’s anything else we can do as far as an appeal, and then at that point, we’ll decide if we’re going to move forward,” he said.

Source:  Written by Brad Hanson, Multimedia Journalist | www.kwwl.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky