LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

EirGrid scraps pylon plan, as second power line is cast into doubt 

Credit:  Paul Melia | Irish Independent | 09/10/2015 | www.independent.ie ~~

EirGrid has scrapped plans for a massive high-voltage overhead power line running across six counties and there are major doubts about a second pylon project.

The company has announced that the Grid Link project between Cork and Kildare will not go ahead, and revealed that a second scheme called Grid West will only proceed if a large-scale wind farm in the west secures planning permission.

Chief executive Fintan Slye said the case for building the 100km Grid West line would change if a 112-turbine Oweninny wind farm planned for Bellacorick in Co Mayo was refused permission.

The €600m renewable energy project, proposed by the ESB and Bord na Móna, is currently with An Bord Pleanála and a decision is expected later this year.
Technology

Mr Slye’s comments came as EirGrid revealed that new technology would be used to bolster existing lines running between Cork and Kildare via Wexford.

It had been proposed to erect high-voltage power lines, or install the lines underground, as part of the controversial Grid Link project, but these options have now been ruled out.

There was vehement local opposition to the 400kV scheme, but earlier this year EirGrid revealed a so-called “regional option”, which involves using technology called “series compensation” to allow more power to flow through existing lines.

The company has now decided to pursue this option, which will cater for the region until at least 2030. There will be consultation with affected communities prior to works commencing.

“The regional option effectively negated the need for new infrastructure,” Mr Slye said. “There is no requirement to proceed with overhead lines. We will be moving ahead to deliver what I believe is a better option for all concerned.

“In 2008, which this project was proposed, it was based on Celtic Tiger growth rates. Demand has dropped, this (option) would not have been feasible in the past. One of the key things we learned was we would need to do a detailed analysis of the options.”

Some upgrade works of existing structures will be required, including 110kV overhead lines between Kilkenny and Wexford via Great Island, while a new 400kV circuit between Moneypoint in Clare and Kilpaddoge in Kerry will be constructed across the Shannon estuary.

The works will cost €156.8m and take four years to complete. The cost of undergrounding power lines for Grid Link was put at €643m, and at €215m if it was erected on pylons.

The Grid Link Action Group said it was “very pleased” with EirGrid’s decision, and called on the Department of the Environment to publish planning guidelines for pylon projects and address health concerns.

“We have questioned the need for the project and asked had all options been considered. It is clear that EirGrid did not give adequate consideration (to the regional option),” spokeswoman Maura Leigh said.

The decision to review the available options came after EirGrid announced late last year that it would improve its public consultation process. It came after chairman John O’Connor admitted that he would not like to live close to a pylon.

A third controversial grid project, the €283m North South Interconnector between Tyrone and Meath, is in planning.

Source:  Paul Melia | Irish Independent | 09/10/2015 | www.independent.ie

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky