LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Stretham wind turbines plan set for refusal 

Credit:  James Podesta | Ely Standard | 29 September 2015 | www.elystandard.co.uk ~~

Plans for two wind turbines, with a maximum height of 102 metres, in Stretham are set to be rejected.

Applicant Chris Attle’s proposal, for Red Hill Farm, have been recommended for refusal when it is goes before East Cambridgeshire District Council’s planning committee.

It also included a crane pad/turning area beside each turbine measuring 25 metres by 40 metres and a sub-station. The turbines would be decommissioned after 25 years.

However, the proposal has been opposed by several councillors, as well as Stretham Parish Council, Haddenham Parish Council, Soham Town Council, Wentworth Parish Council and Waterbeach Parish Council.

Stertham Parish Council said the turbines would have a “visual impact”, causing noise pollution and falling house prices. East Cambridgeshire already has “more than enough” renewable energy, they said.

Officers have cited seven different reasons to refuse the plans: Landscape and visual amenity, cultural heritage, aviation (the turbines would be near Mitchells Farm Airfield), ecology, traffic and transportation, flood risk and pollution, and (lack of) support of the local community.

Officers said: “The council is not satisfied that the planning impacts in relation to landscape and visual amenity, cultural heritage, aviation safety, ecology, traffic and transportation and flood risk, hydrology and pollution have been satisfactorily addressed.

“It has not been established that the harm this application would cause has been outweighed by community benefit.”

Source:  James Podesta | Ely Standard | 29 September 2015 | www.elystandard.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky