Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Campaigners fight Loch Ness windfarm scheme
Credit: Written by Iain Ramage | 29/09/2015 | www.energyvoice.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Campaigners fighting for a moratorium on new windfarm schemes at Loch Ness and the Great Glen have accused planning authorities of failing to fully investigate the damage they could do.
They spoke out after a Holyrood committee snubbed their plea for better protection for the scenic areas.
Activists fear the area’s vital tourism industry will be wrecked by the 500-plus giant turbines already built or proposed for the area.
They were left dismayed when the Scottish Parliament’s public petitions committee opted not to recommend any special planning protection for one of the country’s biggest visitor attractions.
James Treasurer, of the Friends Of The Great Glen pressure group, said it appeared MSPs on the committee were “happy with windfarm developments in the Great Glen despite the destruction of areas of outstanding natural beauty”.
SNP member Kenny MacAskill said during a debate on their plea that turbines were already banned from protected areas and that Highland Council was “on the case”.
But Mr Treasurer said yesterday: “What we see is that the area – and communities – are under threat from over 500 wind turbines approved or in the planning process.
“These figures were questioned (by the politicians). But they are in the public domain.
“No planning authority at local or national level has, therefore, demonstrated that adequate protection is being given. So there was failure to carry out a rigorous inquiry.”
He added: “If Highland Council is, indeed, ‘on the case’ the public and visitors would now like to hear urgently from the council how it intends to safeguard the world class landscapes of the Loch Ness area and the Great Glen and the lifeline visitor economy.”
Councillors have regularly insisted that they consider each windfarm planning application on its individual merits.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: