[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Massive turbine project near Sanquhar gets boot over wildlife worries 

Credit:  By Sandy Kilpatrick | Daily Record | 26 Sep 2015 | www.dailyrecord.co.uk ~~

Upper Nithsdale has missed out on a £6 million windfarm cash boost amid fears over rare birds.

Many residents in the area backed Community Windpower’s proposed Spango development.

Its plans for 14 turbines would have generated £6.125 million for Upper Nithsdale’s depressed economy over 25 years.

But the proposal was this week rejected by planning councillors because of the impact it would have on the environment and an internationally important wildlife site.

The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds objected to the revised proposal for part of the Muirkirk and North Lowther Uplands Special Protection Area.

An RSPB spokesman said: “The windfarm will have a significant effect on the habitats of hen harrier, peregrine, merlin, short-eared owl and golden plover.”

And a council architect pointed out that it would have “significant adverse landscape, visual and cumulative effects.”

There were individual letters of support from 48 Upper Nithsdale residents. And both Sanquhar and Kirkconnel and Kelloholm community councils were also in favour.

But councillors went with the recommendation to reject the revised bid which had been scaled down from the original 24-turbine scheme.

Provost Ted Thompson said: “This is a wrong application and it’s in the wrong place and I’m happy to refuse it.”

His motion was supported by the committee with one councillor, Alistair Witts, recording his dissent.

Mr Witts told colleagues he was “not convinced” the application should be rejected.

However, officials advised members that proposed community benefits were not material planning matters.

Afterwards, Kelloholm councillor John Syme, who is not on the planning committee, expressed disappointment at the decision.

He said: “The days are gone when windfarm money would’ve been used for hanging baskets, it would have made a real difference. We can’t rely on the opencast mines forever, Brown Brothers (meat factory) is a saving grace but the windfarms offer opportunities for deprived communities.”

Meanwhile, the committee approved an application by Dumfries Wind Energy Limited to erect a wind speed measuring mast on the Keir Hills south west of Thornhill.

Source:  By Sandy Kilpatrick | Daily Record | 26 Sep 2015 | www.dailyrecord.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tags: Victories, Wildlife

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky