LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Moray wind farm proposal refused 

Credit:  The Northern Scot | 15/09/2015 | www.northern-scot.co.uk ~~

Moray’s Brown Muir will remain turbine free after councillors refused a proposed wind farm.

Developers vento ludens had hoped to create a 12-turbine development on a hillside site between Fogwatt and Rothes.

But following a 30-minute debate this afternoon, members of Moray Council’s planning and regulatory services committee narrowly voted against the development.

That followed a recommendation from officers that it be refused on the grounds of “significant adverse landscape and visual effects”.

Speyside Councillors Pearl Paul and Mike McConachie disagreed that it would have an unacceptable impact and moved that the development be approved. Councillor Paul said the proposal was in an “area of search” for wind developments; had been sensitively sited; and would bring economic benefits to the area.

She also questioned when Brown Muir became a landmark hill.

“It was just a bump on the landscape to be quite honest and then suddenly it became a landmark. I find that quite misleading to be honest because we barely even thought of it as a hill,” she said.

Proposing that it be refused in line with the officers’ report was Councillor Allan Wright, backed by committee chairman Councillor Chris Tuke. Councillor Tuke said he accepted that the developers had gone some way to reducing the impact.

“But in my mind, and in 1,337 other people’s minds, this is an unacceptable visual impact on the landscape,” he said.

With the vote hanging in the balance at 6-6, Councillor Tuke, as committee chair, had the casting vote and the application was refused.

Source:  The Northern Scot | 15/09/2015 | www.northern-scot.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky