LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Emotions high at wind farm meeting; Tower approved to study wind data 

Credit:  Published 09/14 2015 | www.stjoechannel.com ~~

It was a full house in DeKalb County to talk about the future of a wind energy project. Of the approximate 100 people who came, almost all of them were strongly opposed.

“We just don’t want to live in a wind farm, said Bill Saunders, who brought a petition forward with around 40 signatures urging against the project.

“Nobody wants to look at these huge 350 ft. wind towers,” David Thomas who lives near Osborn and says a turbine would be erected less than one mile from his home.

NextEra Energy wants to erect 97 wind turbines. Thursday’s meeting was to approve the construction of two meteorological towers to get raw data on wind speeds and determine if a wind farm is financially feasible.

However, those at the meeting speaking against the project don’t even want the measuring towers.

“Met towers come first, wind turbines follow,” Saunders said.

Though most of the vocal crowd showed their resistance to the wind farm, NextEra Energy representatives cite polling that shows about 70 percent support for the project. Also, they say they have more than 50 land owners already under contract should the project go through.

“We’ve been in this area since the 2008 time period,” said Jeremy Ferrell, Project Director for the company. “We’ve had a number of landowners excited and positive about the project. Quite frankly, we wouldn’t be in an area where we didn’t have supportive landowners.”

Those against the project say property values would decrease. They also cited potential noise and health concerns and how many people have moved to the countryside to enjoy the quiet.

The vote to approve the MET towers passed 3-0 with one abstention.

The company has also met resistance in Clinton County, where county commissioners have so far voted against the project moving forward.

Ferrell says if they stay on schedule, they would like to start constructing the turbines in 2016.

Source:  Published 09/14 2015 | www.stjoechannel.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon