[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Future of wind project unclear  

Credit:  By KEVIN L. GREEN | The Courier-Times | September 13, 2015 | www.thecouriertimes.com ~~

A representative of Apex Clean Energy says a recent Rush County decision to cease negotiations with the company regarding the placement of wind turbines in that county has created some unanswered questions.

As was reported in The C-T earlier this week, the Rush County Commissioners on Tuesday unanimously voted to cease talks with Apex about the placement of large wind turbines commonly referred to as the Flat Rock Wind Farm. The company’s original plan was to place approximately 65 wind turbines in Rush County, a roughly $200 million investment, and as many as 29 turbines in Henry County, an investment of nearly $100 million.

Dahvi Wilson, Apex Clean Energy’s Senior Manager of Public Affairs, said he is disappointed in the vote as well as the way the matter was handled by the Rush County officials.

“We are disappointed that the commissioners took this action after several of them stated during the Tuesday commissioners’ meeting that they were not prepared to make any decisions about the project. There was no item related to the wind energy project on the agenda for the meeting, and we believe the commissioners’ decision to act without providing any notice that they were considering this issue did a serious disservice to those of their constituents who support the project and were denied the opportunity to share their views,” Wilson said.

He also said it’s unclear whether or not the Rush County vote means the proposed project must be scrapped.

“We are assessing the implications of the commissioners’ action to determine how it may impact the project timeline,” Davis said, adding that the company also is assessing whether or not they will file a legal appeal regarding the decision. As well, Davis said a decision as to whether or not the company will proceed with the Henry County part of its plan has not been made at this time.

Apex has filed a legal appeal regarding a decision made by the Rush County Board of Zoning Appeals that allowed for construction of the turbines but which changed setback requirements for the turbines from 1,000 feet to 2,300 feet. Davis said he isn’t sure what, if any, impact the commissioners’ recent decision may have on that case.

“That proceeding is still in process, and we cannot comment on it at this time,” he said.

Henry County Commissioner Ed Yanos said earlier this week he was disappointed in the vote by his southern counterparts. New Castle-Henry County Economic Development Corporation President and CEO Corey Murphy also voiced his disappointment. Murphy has suggested in the past that Henry County move forward with hosting wind turbines being proposed by Apex as well as NextEra with or without Rush County, which until recently has been a willing partner in such economic development endeavors.

“I’m hoping (Rush County) moves on and takes the additional step of amending their development code to remove the regulations necessary for wind energy to operate there. That would only make sense based on their actions recently” Murphy said at this week’s meeting of the Henry County Commissioners.

He also said he doesn’t know what impact the recent Rush County decision will have on the NextEra project, commonly referred to as the Whitewater Wind Farm, which involves placement of 77 wind turbines including 43 in Fayette County, 25 in Rush County, and eight in Henry County.

Source:  By KEVIN L. GREEN | The Courier-Times | September 13, 2015 | www.thecouriertimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.