[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm plan needs more transparency 

Credit:  Herald & Review | herald-review.com ~~

I witnessed a rather curious bit of democracy at a recent meeting of the Macon County Board’s Environmental, Education, Health and Welfare Committee. The main topic of the meeting was to hear from residents concerning the German utility company E. ON’s proposed wind farm in northern Macon County.

The committee chairman allowed E.ON’s lawyer to open the discussion with a defense of the wind farm. Following that, several county residents, both for and against, stated their positions. After the county residents spoke, the chairman then called the E.ON lawyer back to the podium to rebut the arguments against the wind farm. Opponents of the wind farm were denied any chance to respond to the statements of the E.ON lawyer.

The chairman then allowed one minute for a discussion of the issue by the board, All that took place was some hurried whispering among board members and then the board’s lawyer announced the published motion that had been placed before the board needed a last-second change. Instead of voting on all 140 wind turbines in one motion, the board would vote on 136 wind turbines in one motion and then voted on four wind turbines in a second motion. One board member abstained from voting on the motion involving four wind turbines, which was never explained.

The wind farm project has suffered from a lack of transparency from the start. One board member abstained because information on the wind farm was only recently made available by E.ON and she had not been able to fully review it.

Residents living near the proposed location of the wind farm have not been provided information from E.ON. Perhaps, the entire board should take the time to fully review this project and its impact on the county.

John Cook


Source:  Herald & Review | herald-review.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky