[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Controversial plans for 16 more wind turbines at Scout Moor passed despite concerns  

Credit:  PETE MAGILL | Lancashire Telegraph | www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk ~~

Controversial plans for more wind turbines on East Lancashire’s moorlands have been passed – despite fears over the view and the ‘thud and swish’ of the proposed 115-metre high structures.

Bosses at Peel Energy and United Utilities survived a vote of no confidence by Rossendale councillors Jimmy Eaton and Granville Morris to see their scheme passed for 16 extra giant blades to be erected at Scout Moor, Edenfield.

Now the companies must wait and see if Communities Secretary Greg Clark ‘calls in’ the application for the 37 megawatt extension on the Rossendale and Rochdale border.

The Ministry of Defence has maintained its objection that the turbines would pose a threat to the primary radar and air traffic control at Warton Airfield – but it was felt the concerns could be addressed by mitigation measures.

Tom Whitehead, a chartered town planner speaking on behalf of protesters in Rossendale, Rochdale and Bury, said that when petitions and MP Jake Berry’s Not On Our Hills campaign was considered, only three per cent of local communities were in favour of the wind farm.

Resident Stuart Davis, from Whitworth, questioned the merits of a proposed community fund – claiming that around £125,000 of a previous habitat renewal allocation had actually been spent on United Utilities own land.

He added: “I have walked on the moors for 50 years and it’s part of who I am. It is deeply concerning to see the destruction of Rossendale’s jewel in the crown.”

Dr Christopher Woods, a Ramsbottom GP, said the application should be delayed until fledgling studies on the health effects of amplitude modulation, the noise generated by giant turbines, had been completed.

But Jonathan England, Peel’s development director, said the firm, which had reduced the number of turbines from 26 to 16 after extensive public consultations, had listened to potential objections.

He told councillors that not only would the scheme result in a major boost for renewable energy but would lead to the restoration of hundreds of hectares of ‘degraded’ peat moorland.

Mr England added: “New jobs will be created and we are determined, through a local procurement scheme and employment strategy, that local people will benefit.”

Cllr Granville Morris said the noise from the turbines was like the ‘drone of jet engine’.

Source:  PETE MAGILL | Lancashire Telegraph | www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.