[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Major questions about Otis turbine  

Credit:  Berkshire Eagle | 09/01/2015 | www.berkshireeagle.com ~~

There are some serious issues regarding the proposed wind turbine in Otis that taxpayers should consider before voting for a Prop 2½ override Sept. 8 to fund the community-owned 415-foot tall GE turbine.

Why is the project relying on an old feasibility study (2012) done for a different location than the currently-proposed site and for different makes of turbines than the one chosen?

Why is the project relying on estimated wind speeds? The standard feasibility study method calls for installing an anemometer and running it for a year to get the true basis on which to predict the amount of electricity that could be generated. Instead Otis relied on the Massachusetts GIS wind resources map, which uses modeling. Factual data is better than virtual data.

Why has community concern over the height of the turbine been neglected? The standard method is to fly a balloon at the height of the turbine. This was not done. Comparing the project with the considerably smaller, 290-foot tall Williams stone quarry turbine is misleading.

Why haven’t residents been provided information regarding nearby projects where unanticipated costs have affected the bottom line? The MassDEP required the owners of the Hoosac (Iberdrola) to install serrated edges on the blades of the turbines at great expense. This spring a gearbox failure on one of the Brodie Mountain turbines had to be replaced at great cost to the owners, the Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co.

Otis town officials should provide answers to these questions so their voters can make an informed decision when going to the polls next week.

Virginia Irvine

The writer is president, Wind Wise Massachusetts.

Source:  Berkshire Eagle | 09/01/2015 | www.berkshireeagle.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.