[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Lawyer wants Fayette wind turbines shut down  

Credit:  By Liz Zemba | Trib Total Media | Pittsburgh Tribune-Review | Aug. 25, 2015 | triblive.com ~~

A Uniontown attorney wants Fayette County to order the shutdown of about two dozen wind turbines, but a spokesman with the Oregon company that owns them says there are no grounds to force a stoppage.

In a letter delivered late Monday to the county’s Office of Planning, Zoning and Community Development, Gary Altman asked the county to order Iberdrola Renewables of Portland to stop operating approximately 22 wind turbines in its South Chestnut Wind Project near Farmington.

Altman contends the turbines don’t comply with a number of conditions set by the county’s zoning hearing board in 2009, including setbacks, decommissioning bonds, noise levels and measures to protect bats.

“Pending compliance, we request that you order the turbines shut off,” Altman said in the letter. “We believe this request to be reasonable in view of the fact that several of these (zoning hearing board) conditions were to be met before the start of operations, and this developer has consistently and repeatedly ignored Fayette County’s ordinances and tried to delay any enforcement of them, all the while knowing full well that its project was constructed without required permits and approvals.”

Art Sasse of Iberdrola said the company has no plans to shut down the wind farm because it complies with zoning regulations.

“Our South Chestnut wind farm is fully compliant with the current zoning ordinance and will continue to operate as it has for several years now,” Sasse said.

In the years since Altman has battled Iberdrola over the windmills on behalf of Springhill resident Thomas J. Bozek, Fayette revised its zoning governing wind turbines that might render the appeals moot, according to court documents in one of the appeals.

Altman said the turbines are too close to Bozek’s property, rendering a portion of it unusable because of the noise they generate.

“The biggest issue is, he has a domino-shaped piece of property, and the top half is close to the turbines,” Altman said. “They have effectively taken that piece of property off of him. You can’t build on it because of the noise.”

Altman’s letter to the county is dated five days after the state Supreme Court, in an Aug. 19 order, denied Iberdrola’s request to appeal a 2014 Commonwealth Court decision. In that decision, the court upheld conditions the zoning hearing board placed on the windmills in 2009.

According to a March 11 supplemental opinion prepared by the Commonwealth Court judges, those conditions included construction of 12-foot-high chain link fences around the turbines, planting vegetation to replace trees and shrubs removed during the turbines’ construction, implementing measures to protect bats and conducting sound studies.

The wind turbines formerly were associated with PPM Atlantic Renewable, which was acquired by Iberdrola Renewables in 2005.

According to Iberdrola’s website, the South Chestnut Wind Project began operating in 2011 and comprises 23 wind turbines in Georges, Springhill and Wharton townships.

Only the wind turbines in Georges and Springhill are affected by the litigation because Wharton has its own zoning rules. Zoning in Georges and Springhill is governed by the county’s ordinance.

Sara Rosiek, director of the county’s planning office, said Iberdrola in June notified her it posted decommissioning bonds on the turbines, meeting at least one of the requirements cited in Altman’s letter. She said she is arranging to meet with county solicitor Sheryl Heid to review the letter and other issues raised by Altman.

Heid did not return a phone call seeking comment.

Source:  By Liz Zemba | Trib Total Media | Pittsburgh Tribune-Review | Aug. 25, 2015 | triblive.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Complaints

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch