[ exact phrase in "" ]

[ Google-powered ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Longannet power station closure: Conservatives ask if wind turbines are to blame  

Credit:  By Leeza Clark | The Courier | 24 August 2015 | www.thecourier.co.uk ~~

Did Wind Turbines Kill Longannet?

Fife Conservatives have argued that may have been the case.

“In the lead up to the sad announcement that Longannet power station is to close, much has been made of high transmission charges,” said Conservative group leader on Fife Council, Dave Dempsey.

While these arise from Longannet’s location, far from the biggest centres of demand down south, the Fife Conservatives are asking whether Scotland’s large excess of theoretical generating capacity, much of it from wind turbines, was a contributory factor.

Longannet has a massive bill to connect to the National Grid – its location greatly disadvantages the station against others in the south of England, due to the current trans- mission charging regime.

This means the Fife plant faces a transmission penalty of £40 million per year, solely because of its location.

Mr Dempsey said: “The process for calculating these charges is fiendishly complicated, but a number of things are clear.

“It costs money to generate electricity far from where it’ll be consumed.

“There’s the transmission infrastructure to maintain, power is lost during transmission, the loss increases with distance, transmitting large amounts requires high capacity all the way along the network, with no bottlenecks.

“The charging regime is based on times of highest demand.

“It looks at all the capacity and assumes that demand is met by every generator operating at the same fraction of its peak.

“So, if overall there was 10% spare, each generator would be assumed to running at 90%.

“It then works out the flows along the network and charges each generator according to how far its electricity had to travel.

“In this theoretical situation, Scotland would be generating roughly twice the power it needs so its electricity would need to travel the long distances south.

“If all of Scotland’s electricity came from a string of Longannets, we would probably accept that we had too many and that some ought to be closed down.

“However, it’s not like that,” he said.

Mr Dempsey argued that a large part of Scotland’s generating capacity came from wind turbines which “produce power sometimes”.

“That’s why we need other capacity – to make up the gap when the wind stops.

“So it would seem that the proliferation of turbines has served to rack up the charges. We have an oversupply of an unreliable technology.

“Ironically, it looks as if Longannet’s demise may reduce the charges for other Scottish sites.”

Source:  By Leeza Clark | The Courier | 24 August 2015 | www.thecourier.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User contributions

Share:


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

HOME
Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share