[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

‘Feedback forms stolen and comment pages ripped away’ during Chislet Windfarm consultation  

Credit:  Canterbury Times | July 28, 2015 | www.canterburytimes.co.uk ~~

A public consultation into controversial wind farm plans may have been sabotaged after completed feedback forms were reportedly stolen and pages torn from a comments book.

More than 100 Chislet residents squeezed into the local church to give their views on plans to build up to 11 wind turbines on land just south of Thanet Way.

However, RES, the company behind the turbine plan, subsequently discovered the forms had been removed from a closed box, which is illegal.

RES spokesman Alison Jones said: “We want to draw your attention to the fact that completed feedback forms were removed from a closed box and pages torn from the comments book at the Chislet public consultation event last night, at some time between the hours of 7pm and 8pm.

“Whether this was a deliberate attempt to disrupt the consultation, or intended as a silly joke, it is a very serious matter: under the Data Protection Act it is a criminal offence to knowingly obtain, disclose or procure the disclosure of personal information without consent.

“In light of this, we have reported the matter to Kent police.

“We hope that you will join us in persuading the culprit(s) to do the right thing by publicly censuring this thoughtless act as a serious infringement of the democratic rights of local people to have their views heard and respected – whatever those views may be.”

One of those who spoke out against the plan was the area’s MP, Sir Roger Gale, who called the proposal “a non-starter”.

He said he had no idea what had happened to the forms, but put it down to “feelings running high.”

“You will appreciate that your company`s desire to ride roughshod over the wishes of local people led to feelings running high and I am frankly not surprised by that,” he said.

Source:  Canterbury Times | July 28, 2015 | www.canterburytimes.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.