LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME



[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Planning for windfarm refused for a second time 

Credit:  by Christy Parker | Irish Examiner | July 27, 2015 | www.irishexaminer.com ~~

Waterford Council has refused planning permission for a windfarm near the Comeragh Mountains for the second time in four years.

In an amended application, Kilkenny-based Ecopower Developments Ltd had applied to build eight wind turbines, with a height not exceeding 127m, at Ballymacarbry on the western fringe of the mountains.

The site, on a forest ridge, is close to the Tipperary border and about 5km from Clonmel. The council said it was “not satisfied that the development would not significantly compromise the policy to develop the Comeragh area as a national amenity” and feared the visual impact on tourism.

The decision came despite the area being designated a preferred location for wind energy under the Waterford County Development Plan 2007 to 2011.

The company is to appeal the decision to An Bord Pleanála. The local authority refused the initial application for nine turbines on similar grounds in 2011.

An Bord Pleanála subsequently upheld the refusal on the grounds of inadequate assessments relating to water quality, drainage, transportation, road improvements, architecture, heritage, and bird species.

However the board disagreed with the council’s appraisal that the development “would clearly impact on the character, integrity, and uniformity of the landscape of the area when viewed form the surroundings”.

Ecopower Developments project manager Philomena Kenealy said the company is “very disappointed” with the latest decision”, adding:

“We consider it a very suitable site because of elevation and the separation distance, with the nearest turbine 884m from the nearest house. We feel it can be developed without any negative effect on nearest residents or on the receiving environment.”

Source:  by Christy Parker | Irish Examiner | July 27, 2015 | www.irishexaminer.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky