[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Suit claims county violated wind farm opponents due process 

Credit:  By Andy Koen | July 23, 2015 | www.koaa.com ~~


Wind towers are going up over Calhan. A judge denied a request by property owners who are suing the county to stop construction while court proceedings are underway. The judge also denied the county’s request to dismiss the lawsuit altogether.

As the parties continue to file motions, the newest development looks squarely at the public meeting on February 5 to approve the land use.

“The board knew there were going to be winners and losers with this decision couldn’t make everyone happy,” said County Spokesperson Dave Rose of the meeting.

At issue is whether the county violated due process rights of the people speaking out against the project. The plaintiffs claim the County Attorney censored them by stopping people from saying things like the board was bribed.  They also claim commissioners were biased in their decision because of comments they later made to reporters suggesting they feared being sued by the developers.

The judge released the developers from this part of the suit because it deals exclusively with the actions of government. 

Still, Rose said the County denies that they violated anyone’s due process.

“The county flatly rejects the argument that the decision was not made with due process. In point of fact, there were many public hearings associated with that both at the planning commission and at the Board of County Commissioners.”

The County Attorney’s Office is defending the board in the Lawsuit. News 5 reached out to the plaintiffs in the case for comment but none of them were available for interview. We hope to hear from them in the future.



Motion to Dismiss

Order denying injunction

Order denying motion to dismiss

Order on motion to rule on plaintiff’s second claim

Source:  By Andy Koen | July 23, 2015 | www.koaa.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Complaints

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky