[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind turbines violate quality of life  

Credit:  The Daily Republic | Jul 10, 2015 | www.mitchellrepublic.com ~~

In response to wind developer Rob Johnson’s July 3 letter:

Again, the developers and profiteers of wind energy and wind farms are becoming irritated as their dirty little secrets are being exposed. The letter states, “as significant research has shown, there is no scientific consensus to support the so-called “Wind Turbine Syndrome.” And he points to a government study from Massachusetts saying “there was no evidence found regarding negative health impacts on people living in the surrounding community.”

It is amazing how carefully developers choose their words, hoping that no one honestly thinks about what is really being said and what is not. We are not talking about the “surrounding community.” We are talking about the people living under the turbines within approximately 1 to 2 miles.

“Nocebo effect”? Sounds like something a government study would come up with. Are you aware that in Massachusetts in November 2013, a judge restricted the operation of the Falmouth Municipal Wind Farm because of annoyance to local residents?

You might also want to read about the Shirley Wind Farm in Wisconsin being declared a “human health hazard,” and three families having to move out of their homes.

Or Dr. Nina Pierpont’s study on rural residents in New York. Of the 10 families living within 1.5 miles of a wind turbine, someone from each family was sick. Eight of the 10 families have moved away; the other two families are having a hard time selling their homes.

Maybe you should talk to the doctor in Knox County, Neb., that couldn’t get a good night’s sleep for two years after the turbines went up.

They would all beg to differ with your “other sources” comment.

As usual, your agenda is exposed at the end of your letter: “The future of wind energy will provide great opportunities, both financially and as a clean energy source.” Financial opportunities for you, Mr. Johnson, and a few others. But, for those of us who would be forced to live under the turbines, a violation and loss of our quality of life.

Marsha Hubner


Source:  The Daily Republic | Jul 10, 2015 | www.mitchellrepublic.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.