[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Economist Tony Mackay backs ‘overly high’ windfarm subsidy axe  

Credit:  By Andrew Argo | The Courier | 10 July 2015 | www.thecourier.co.uk ~~

Scottish economist Tony Mackay said the massive subsidies for onshore windfarms produced “supernormal” profits for Scottish businesses and landowners.

The costs of the “unnecessarily high” payments have been borne by electricity consumers through higher bills, he believed, and the UK Government is right to reduce them.

Mr Mackay was commenting on the eve of Scottish Energy Minister Fergus Ewing chairing a green energy summit on the impact of UK Government plans to end onshore wind farm subsidies.

UK Energy Secretary Amber Rudd said ending the scheme meant energy bills would not need to rise, but Mr Ewing accused the Conservatives of ignoring Scottish concerns.

The Scottish Government said the plans will disproportionately affect Scotland, which has about 70% of the UK’s onshore wind capacity and proposed projects.

Industry body Scottish Renewables has warned that the change could put up to £3 billion of investment and 5,400 jobs at risk.

Describing the system of windfarm subsidies as a shambles, Mr Mackay said subsidies were unusually offered for schemes’ operating costs and revenue unlike most subsidies which went towards capital investments.

After a number of feasibility and economic impact studies, the economist had come to the indirect conclusion that the subsidies have been 2.8 times higher than required to meet the objectives of more wind energy generation.

“The result is that some people have made, or will make, extraordinary profits from windfarms in Scotland,” he said.

The main beneficiaries of the “supernormal profits” have been the large companies such as Scottish Power and SSE, he added.

He believes electricity bills in Scotland are about 10% higher than they would be without the subsidies, which have also produced a backlash from environmentalists opposed to the growth of windfarms.

He said the UK Government’s proposed changes were “a sensible step forward,” and he hopes they will result in lower electricity prices for Scottish consumers.

Source:  By Andrew Argo | The Courier | 10 July 2015 | www.thecourier.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.