[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Town, wind energy developers await state  

Credit:  By Ashley Saari | Monadnock Ledger-Transcript | Wednesday, July 8, 2015 | (Published in print: Thursday, July 9, 2015) | www.ledgertranscript.com ~~

The state’s Site Evaluation Committee has finished taking testimony on whether it should take jurisdiction of an oft-debated wind energy project in Antrim. Its final decision, however, will not be handed down until the end of the month.

The Select Board, along with the project’s developer, Eolian Renewable Energy, petitioned the SEC to take jurisdiction of the project.

“Are they going to take jurisdiction or not? Boy, I don’t know. I thought the board and Antrim Wind presented a compelling case for jurisdiction,” said Select Board Chair Gordon Webber in an interview Wednesday.

The Site Evaluation Committee is set to deliberate on whether to take jurisdiction of the project on July 24.

Opponents of the project protest that the elimination of one of the towers and shortening of another does not significantly reduce the view impact from Willard Pond. In a filing in support of objections to the petition for jurisdiction, Counsel for the Public Joseph A. Foster wrote, “The petitioner has not established that the proposed project is substantially or materially different than the former project such that it would result in a change in the Committee’s decision that it would pose unreasonable adverse impacts to the aesthetics of the community.”

After already being turned down by the SEC once in February 2013, Antrim Wind and its parent company Eolian Renewable Energy have resubmitted a similar project sited in the same location. In deference to the SEC’s concerns that the turbines had too big a visual impact from significant sites such as Gregg Lake and particularly Willard Pond, a wildlife sanctuary, the project eliminated the tower closest to Willard Pond and shortened the next-closest by 45 feet.

While the project is now proposed to create 28.8 megawatts of energy – short of the 30 megawatts that would require the SEC to step in – Antrim town officials and Eolian are still seeking the state to take jurisdiction. A lack of a large-scale wind ordinance in town and the multiple separate permits that Eolian would have to seek through the town – which are all included in one process at the SEC – are motivating factors.

Source:  By Ashley Saari | Monadnock Ledger-Transcript | Wednesday, July 8, 2015 | (Published in print: Thursday, July 9, 2015) | www.ledgertranscript.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.