[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbine plan near Ellesmere is thrown out 

Credit:  Shropshire Star | July 2, 2015 | www.shropshirestar.com ~~

An appeal by developers wanting to build a wind turbine almost 100 metres tall near Ellesmere has been thrown out by planning inspectors.

The 327ft (99.7 metre) turbine was planned for Tetchill, but the scheme was axed because of the impact it could have on nearby heritage sites such as Ellesmere Wharf and the Grade II* listed building Hardwick Hall.

It comes after hundreds of people objected to the plans put forward by developers Seven Sisters, saying the turbine would distract motorists and harm the landscape.

Planning officers at Shropshire Council rejected the plans in November.

Councillor Ian Ward, mayor of Ellesmere, said: “I think most people in the town think it is a wonderful result.

“It would have had such an adverse impact on the visibility and the nearby heritage buildings. “It is a very pleasing result and it is one problem off our plates.It is good to see a result like this when the community has spoken more or less as one voice.”

“There were a few people who were for it, but most were against it.

“I think it was the wrong place for a turbine – there are other places where it might have been more suitable.

“But for the town I think this is the right decision now.”

In her report, planning inspector Anne Jordan said: “In local and mid-range views the visual impact of a turbine of the scale and location proposed, would have a very significant harmful effect on the local area.

“Together the harm to landscape and visual amenity, and the harm the proposal would cause to a number of heritage assets in the locality would be greater than the benefits to renewable energy provision, and to the economic sustainability of the agricultural holding.”

Source:  Shropshire Star | July 2, 2015 | www.shropshirestar.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky