[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

3-2 vote denies certificate of convenience and necessity for Grain Belt Express 

Credit:  Trevor McDonald, Hannibal Courier-Post reporter | Posted Jul. 1, 2015 | www.hannibal.net ~~

The Missouri Public Service Commission denied a crucial certificate for a multi-state wind-powered transmission line proposal that would pass through Ralls County if built.

Commissioners voted 3-2 on Wednesday to deny a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity for the Clean Line Energy Partners Grain Belt Express Clean Line proposal, Missouri Public Service Commission spokesperson Kevin Kelly said. Supporters and opponents of the $2 billion proposal prepared to pore through each paragraph of the commission’s order to determine what the future might hold.

Commissioners assessed specific criteria for the decision to grant or deny the certificate: there must be a need for the proposed service and it must “promote the public interest”; the applicant must be qualified to provide the proposal and possess the financial ability to complete a proposal that is economically feasible.

The commission determined that Clean Line Energy Partners demonstrated its qualifications and financial ability related to the proposal, but the commissioners decided the proposal did not satisfy the remaining stipulations.

“In this case the evidence shows that any actual benefits to the general public from the Project are outweighed by the burdens on affected landowners. The Commission concludes that GBE has failed to meet its burden of proof to demonstrate that the Project as described in its application for a certificate of convenience and necessity promotes the public interest,” according to a Missouri Public Service Commission written release.

Clean Line Energy Partners representatives told commissioners about the proposal’s “enormous benefits” to Missouri, including potential jobs, annual tax revenue for counties in the proposed path and meeting future EPA clean energy requirements, Director of Development Mark Lawlor said.

“There appears to be some confusion by a majority of commissioners about the benefits of this project to Missouri,” Lawlor said.

Clean Line Energy Partners would review the Public Service Commission order carefully to determine possible options for the future of the project.

“We feel like the project is too important to the state of Missouri to not pursue a way forward,” Lawlor said.

Wind on the Wires – a St. Paul, Minn.-based nonprofit organization of groups related to the wind energy industry – saw considerable potential for the project as well.

“The PSC’s decision today is a huge missed opportunity to provide low-cost clean energy to the Heartland and to create the jobs and economic development that comes along with wind development and transmission projects like the Grain Belt Express, Wind on the Wires Executive Director Beth Soholt,” said.

But opposition groups were encouraged by the Wednesday decision, including Block Grain Belt Express – a group of Missouri farmers, landowners and residents who oppose the project.

“The commissioners apparently believed that the proposed line is not needed by the citizens of Missouri,” Block Grain Belt Express Vice President Jennifer Gatrel said. “Grain Belt does have additional options it might pursue. We, however, are confident that we can succeed in preserving what appears to be today’s decision at the Public Service Commission.”

Source:  Trevor McDonald, Hannibal Courier-Post reporter | Posted Jul. 1, 2015 | www.hannibal.net

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky