[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

MP Alan Duncan calls for end to Woolfox Wind Farm  

Credit:  Rutland & Stamford Mercury | Thursday 25 June 2015 | www.stamfordmercury.co.uk ~~

Rutland MP Sir Alan Duncan has today called on Rutland County Council to seize on wind farm planning changes to reject the Woolfox Wind Farm application, and welcomed the news that the subsidy regime for turbines is to be withdrawn a year earlier than planned.

In a written statement to the House of Commons on June 18, Communities and Local Government Secretary Greg Clark confirmed that all planning applications for wind farms should only be approved if the site is identified as suitable for wind energy development in a Local or Neighbourhood Plan and the proposal has the backing of the local community.

Additionally, Energy Secretary Amber Rudd confirmed in Parliament on June 21, that new subsidies for onshore wind are to be ended from April 2016 – a year earlier than planned. These two changes will mean that any new application cannot expect to receive public subsidy, nor expect to go ahead without the backing of local people.

Mr Duncan said: ‘I hope this spells the end for the Woolfox Wind Farm. We have always known it has absolutely no public support, but now it will have no access to public subsidy either. I have asked the Council to confirm the detailed impact of these changes, but hope this will be a spur to them to say ‘No’ to Woolfox and that this proposal will never go ahead.’

Mr Duncan also spoke in the House of Commons during the Energy Secretary’s statement on Monday to ask her to consider making it compulsory for all wind farm applicants to have to fly a blimp balloon at the height of any proposed turbine to demonstrate its true visual impact.

We had not been able to contact anyone at Woolfox applicants RES for a comment at the time of going to press.

Source:  Rutland & Stamford Mercury | Thursday 25 June 2015 | www.stamfordmercury.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.