[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Developer appeals against decision to reject Creag a’ Bhàird windfarm bid 

Credit:  By Jamie Buchan | The Courier | 24 June 2015 | www.thecourier.co.uk ~~

A major windfarm bid that was thrown out by councillors has been resurrected.

Renewables specialist Force 9 Energy had its plans for a 13-turbine development near Aberfeldy rejected after a considerable backlash from locals, community councils and conservation groups.

Perth and Kinross Council received nearly 100 letters and emails calling for the multi-million-pound Creag a’ Bhàird plan to be scrapped.

Members of the development management committee unanimously ruled against the scheme – which is close to the massive SSE-operated Griffin windfarm – on the basis that it would have a detrimental impact on the surrounding area.

Now, Force 9 has appealed against the decision to the Scottish Government. In its letter to the Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals, a spokesman for the company argues that the scheme would not have a harmful impact on the area.

“The Creag a’ Bhàird windfarm is well contained within its landscape setting, clearly sitting within the Highland summits and plateaux landscape character type,” he said.

“It does not impinge unduly on any other landscape character type. It relates well to the existing Griffin windfarm and, as such, its visual impact closely follows that of the Griffin scheme, in that it is well contained within the landscape context.”

He said the turbines would be only visible from “discrete sections of road” closest to the site.

Opponents claimed that the turbines would be noisy, unsightly and could lead to a downturn in tourist numbers.

They pointed out that, when the much larger Griffin development was approved, four of its turbines were removed to limit its impact on the nearest households.

Addressing fellow members of the development management committee in March, Councillor John Kellas said: “We have fought hard to preserve this tourist route, which is a very attractive part of Perthshire.

“We need to continue to do so and stop it turning into an industrialised zone.”

Source:  By Jamie Buchan | The Courier | 24 June 2015 | www.thecourier.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky