[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Impact of wind turbines near Gargrave would be ‘relentless’, planning inspector told  

Credit:  By Lesley Tate, Senior Reporter | Craven Herald & Pioneer | www.cravenherald.co.uk ~~

The lives of two Craven farming families would be destroyed by the impact of three 328ft high wind turbines, a hearing heard.

If built, the impact on the families would be relentless, there would be no escape either when inside their homes, or outside on their farms, whether working, or enjoying a barbecue, the public hearing heard.

The two-day hearing in Skipton heard evidence for and against EnergieKontor’s plans to build the three turbines on farmland at Brightenber Hill, near Gargrave.

It was the third appeal hearing over the seven years since the company first submitted plans for five turbines on the same site.

But around 40 people, including three planning barristers, were told by government inspector, Mike Robins, that since the last appeal decision had been quashed following a legal challenge at the end of last year, no weight could be attached to it.

Mr Robins did, however, stress that he had all past papers and evidence and was happy to listen to anyone who wanted to speak and would spend a large part of the second day carrying out a “substantial” site visit.

That would include the closest farms to the site, Ash Tree Farm and Haugh Field Farm, the listed Gledstone Hall, Stainton Cotes, and distant viewpoints, even possibly Malham Tarn.

David Hardy, counsel for EK, said a sum of money had been offered to the owner of Ash Tree Farm for the planting of trees to screen the development.

He said the last appeal decision must be seen as “waste paper” and that the right decision was to allow the appeal.

He argued that EK had responded in the right way after the first appeal which he claimed focused on the two turbines closest to Ash Tree Farm, and since they were no longer part of the scheme, the application must be allowed to go ahead.

But the hearing heard from both Ian Coates, of Ash Tree Farm, and Jonathan Berresford, of Haugh Field Farm, about the devastating impact of the three turbines on their lives.

Mr Coates explained how they would be visible from 90 per cent of his land and how his 16-year-old daughter had commented how it seemed they had been fighting the turbines all her life.

“We will be living and working in the fields around the turbines the whole time and there will be no respite,” he said.

Mr Berresford, who supplies Morrisons Supermarket, said the impact on his farm would be every bit as bad as on Ash Tree Farm.

“Every window would face the nearest turbine, there would be no escape and no respite,” he said.

Source:  By Lesley Tate, Senior Reporter | Craven Herald & Pioneer | www.cravenherald.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.