[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Archaeologists object to Bute turbine plans  

Credit:  By Craig Borland | The Buteman | 14 June 2015 | www.buteman.co.uk ~~

The West of Scotland Archaeology Service has added its voice to those objecting to Bute Community Power’s plans for two wind turbines on the island.

The organisation says there is “insufficient information…submitted to demonstrate that the effect of the turbines on the setting of the scheduled fort is within acceptable levels”.

The ‘scheduled fort’ referred to is located on Barone Hill, which was the basis for a similar objection to the plans submitted by Historic Scotland on May 28.

The WOSAS response – in which the contact name within the organisation is given as Martin O’Hare – states: “I would also say that it is not necessarily the case that there would be no scope for a renewable energy development in the vicinitiy of Auchintirrie; it may be that the effect of the proposal on the setting of more distant sites could be reduced were smaller turbines to be employed, as these are frequently available in darker colours that would not be so visually prominent against the landscape backdrop.

“If, however, the council wishes to grant planning consent at this stage, I would ask that you get back to me in order that I can provide wording for a suitable condition to address the direct impact of the proposal on archaeological features that may be present in the areas that would be disturbed by construction.”

Bute Community Power is seeking planning permission for two 47-metre turbines at Auchintirrie, each with a generating capacity of 250 kilowatt hours (kWh).

As this article was written the number of online comments from members of the public on the application had reached 220, of which 137 – slightly more than 62 per cent – were objections; there have also been 83 expressions of support.

Source:  By Craig Borland | The Buteman | 14 June 2015 | www.buteman.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.