[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Public inquiry into Strathy windfarm focuses on forestry effects  

Credit:  By Iain Ramage | The Press and Journal | 10 June 2015 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

The focus of a public inquiry into a windfarm in the far north switched yesterday to the forestry created as the result of a highly controversial 1980s government policy of offering tax breaks for tree planting.

An inquiry that began in April resumed in the Sutherland village of Strathy in the heart of the fragile Flow Country, where power giant Scottish and Southern Energy (SSE) wants to build 39 turbines close to 33 it is already building.

The Strathy South scheme has become a battle of wills between SSE and environmental organisations including the bird charity RSPB Scotland.

Their respective legal teams yesterday thrashed out some of the arguments, but the signs were there was a lot of ground still to cover over the next two days before planning conditions could be outlined on Friday.

Shortly before proceedings resumed at Strathy village hall, a group of locals reaffirmed their support for SSE plans which promise substantial community benefits if the project is approved by the Scottish Government.

The day’s evidence featured further complex debate about peat before moving on to vegetation, habitat management and restoration of the landscape.

Aedan Smith of RSPB Scotland felt uncertainty remained about the potential impact on a range of important bird species and on the Flow Country peatland itself, although he said his organisation was in no doubt that the turbine proposal posed “some fairly major risks.”

There was unanimous agreement, however, that the promised removal of a significant swathe of forest would benefit the area.

Much of the forest planted in the 1980s proved an economic disaster in that it was not commercially productive.

“Thirty years on, some of it is commercially viable for extraction, but much of it isn’t,” Mr Smith said.

“It just wasn’t the right place to be planting trees really. The ploughing – for drainage – damaged the surface of the peatlands and the trees themselves add to the drying out effect of peatland that are fundamentally wet places.

“Nobody would have done it had it not been for the tax breaks.”

There was agreement on both sides that naturally stored CO2 is at risk of being released into the atmosphere because of the damage the trees have done.

An extensive restoration programme has been pledged if the turbines are approved.

Scottish Natural Heritage, which objects to the wind development, will outline its case today. (WED)

Source:  By Iain Ramage | The Press and Journal | 10 June 2015 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch