[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Zoning Board of Appeals votes against wind farm  

Credit:  By Kent Casson, For The Daily Leader | Pontiac Daily Leader | Posted Jun. 4, 2015 | www.pontiacdailyleader.com ~~

In a 6-0 vote Tuesday night, the Livingston County Zoning Board of Appeals voted against the proposed Pleasant Ridge Wind Energy Project.

The advisory vote didn’t come without much discussion from board members. After months of hearings and countless pages of testimony, attorney Tom Blakeman instructed the board to evaluate all of the evidence to make a determination. Acting chairman Michael Cornale acknowledged the time, effort and resources put into the hearings.

“I want to thank everyone throughout this process,” he said.

Zoning Board members spent the evening deciding whether or not the wind energy application met or did not meet the standards of a special use permit. They had the choice to deny, grant or grant subject to special use conditions.

Joan Huisman raised questions over financial assurance. She said the only financial assurance she saw was a bank letter.

“We don’t have any dollars to look at.”

The board mirrored an earlier decision from the Planning Commission that the project does not meet the comprehensive plan and the WECS ordinance. Whether or not the project would endanger public health or general welfare prompted a few comments.

“That’s a hard question to answer because no two people are the same,” said John Vitzthum.

“Based on the evidence, there’s a question mark,” added Richard Kiefer.

Agriculture and land values were also taken into consideration by board members. Kiefer believes the company has somewhat addressed property values and guarantees. Board members seemed to agree the project would not impede growth or development in an ag zoning district.

Diana Iverson noted the possible inconvenience the project could cause during harvest season and for school buses traveling on country roads. Kiefer said anything that changes habits is an inconvenience.

Huisman made the initial motion for the vote with a second by Kiefer. The issue now goes before the Livingston County Agriculture, Zoning and Emergency Services Committee today at 5 p.m. for consideration and the entire Livingston County Board has the final say. A date on the final vote has not yet been scheduled.

Source:  By Kent Casson, For The Daily Leader | Pontiac Daily Leader | Posted Jun. 4, 2015 | www.pontiacdailyleader.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.