LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Protecting Dixfield residents  

Credit:  N. Johnson: Protecting Dixfield residents | Nancy Johnson | Sun Journal | May 31, 2015 | www.sunjournal.com ~~

On June 9, Dixfield voters have the opportunity to vote “yes” for a well-crafted wind energy facility ordinance. I would like to address some of the adjustments to that ordinance.

One important change requires decommissioning costs to be placed in escrow before the project begins. That is a common practice for oil, gas, nuclear, hydroelectric and other energy providers. It is good business sense and protects the town from removal expenses of aged turbines.

The original ordinance allows a nighttime decibel level of 42; revision allows for lower levels. Recently, Maine Justice Warren Silver wrote that nighttime decibel levels from wind turbines should be 42 or below. At 42 decibels, the sound level is comparable to having someone quietly talking nonstop while you try to sleep.

Right now, Patriot Renewables has a $2.9 million abatement request (30 percent of assessed value) for its 6-year-old Beaver Ridge Wind facility in Freedom. They contend that the town should have factored 5 percent yearly depreciation into the value of its wind farm.

That points to another issue to consider; while proximate property values risk depreciation from wind turbines, Patriot Renewables itself will be claiming depreciation and, thus, fewer taxes.

When residents cast their votes, they should remember that Patriot Renewables is in business to make money. It is not a benevolent charity. Jay Cashman’s American dream includes profit via construction of turbines and sale of energy.

I hope residents will vote yes” so Dixfield will have a wind ordinance that protects its citizens’ own American dreams.

Nancy Johnson, Dixfield

Source:  N. Johnson: Protecting Dixfield residents | Nancy Johnson | Sun Journal | May 31, 2015 | www.sunjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow:

Mastodon

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch