[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Officials claim turbines could interfere with airport radar  

Credit:  Daniel Mansfield | Ely Standard | 26 May 2015 | www.elystandard.co.uk ~~

The Ministry of Defence (MoD) has objected to plans to erect three wind turbines between Haddenham and Aldreth.

MoD officials say the three turbines being proposed for Berry Fen “will cause unacceptable interference to the ATC radar at Cambridge Airport”.

Rachel Evans, assistant safeguarding officer with the MoD, said: “Wind turbines have been shown to have detrimental effects on the performance of ATC and range control radars.

“These effects cause the desensitisation of radar in the vicinity of the turbines and the creation of ‘false’ aircraft returns which air traffic controllers must treat as real.

“The desensitisation of radar could result in aircraft not being detected by the radar and therefore not presented to air traffic controllers.”

Ms Evans added that if the applicant proved able to overcome issues with radar interference, the MoD would request all turbines be fitted with red or infra-red lighting to alert aircraft.

The company behind the plans, REG Windpower, has applied to East Cambridgeshire District Council to erect the turbines, standing up to 125metres tall, between Haddenham and Aldreth, which is almost 17km from Cambridge Airport.

The company says it will set up a community fund worth thousands of pounds every year to the villages if the wind farm is approved.

An online campaign group in favour of the turbines, Say Yes to Berry Fen Wind Farm, has attracted more than 200 followers.

The application is set to be decided by East Cambridgeshire District Council’s planning committee in the summer.

Source:  Daniel Mansfield | Ely Standard | 26 May 2015 | www.elystandard.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.