[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Complaint to be lodged after Highland wind farm approved in Edinburgh  

Credit:  David Ross, Highland Correspondent | The Herald | 27 May 2015 | www.heraldscotland.com ~~

Local residents are incensed that the Scottish Government has given the green light to a 20 turbine wind farm 10 miles south of Inverness, after it was unanimously refused by councillors.

But now the Chief Reporter in Edinburgh has promised to consider a complaint from campaigners who claim the planning appeals system is flawed and favours developers.

RWE Innogy UK’s plans for the wind farm at Glen Kyllachy near Tomatin were blocked by Highland Council’s south area planning committee in August.

Councillors were concerned about the cumulative impact in an area where several other wind farms have either already been built or are pending.

There were objections by Strathnairn and Strathdearn residents, their community councils and the Findhorn District Salmon Fisheries Board. Scottish Natural Heritage also had concerns.

However the developers lodged an appeal against the council’s decision, which a planning Reporter has now upheld, causing local outrage.

Pat Wells, convener of Strathdearn Against Windfarm Developments (SAWD) said they had immediately appealed to Lindsey Nicoll, Chief Reporter in the Scottish Government’s Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals, to review the conduct of the Glen Kyllachy appeal.

Their letter claimed the Appeal Decision Notice contained “a number of statements which lead us to believe that the decision to uphold the appeal was a political one made before the review process even started. This view is endorsed by the Reporter’s refusal to permit an accompanied site visit despite representations from The Highland Council, local groups and individuals and the local community councils.”

Mrs Wells said they now had a reply: “The Chief Reporter said she did not have the powers to amend or rescind the decision but if we wished she said she could deal with our letter under their complaints procedure. So that is the route we will go.”

She continued “Industrialisation of the Highland landscape on this massive scale is a shameful legacy of SNP planning policy.”

She said that Glen Kyllachy would merge into the 40 turbine Farr wind farm. “There are nearly 800 wind turbines either operational, under construction, approved or in planning within a 25 mile radius of Farr wind farm. ”

But in his decision document, Timothy Brian, the Reporter said:

“I acknowledge that the area already accommodates a large number of turbines, but the current proposal should be assessed on its own merits, which requires the assessment of impacts, including cumulative impact. I have already found that the landscape and visual impact of the proposal is limited, as result of the topography and visual integration with the existing Farr wind farm.”

He concluded that the cumulative impact of this scheme would not be as pronounced as the objectors feared.

Source:  David Ross, Highland Correspondent | The Herald | 27 May 2015 | www.heraldscotland.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.