[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Planners deliver major blow to windfarm project  

Credit:  By Graeme Strachan | The Courier | 13 May 2015 | www.thecourier.co.uk ~~

Angus Council’s planning department has delivered what might be the fatal blow to a major windfarm project.

Head of planning Vivien Smith’s report recommends the council objects to the proposed Macritch Hill windfarm on the Angus/Perthshire border.

The report states: “It is considered that the proposal would give rise to significant and adverse landscape and visual impacts and also to significant and adverse cumulative landscape and visual impacts.

“The potential benefits of the proposal…are acknowledged but the adverse landscape and visual impacts are considered to be unacceptable.”

The report will go before a full meeting of Angus Council on Thursday and any objection made would require Scottish Ministers to hold a public local inquiry before the application is determined.

Developer Eneco UK submitted an application for 18 turbines between Glen Prosen and Glen Isla, each 125 metres, to the Scottish Government in January.

Eneco say the energy produced could supply Scottish Water with up to a third of their annual energy consumption.

The site is approximately six miles north west of Kirriemuir and has been named Macritch Hill after the hill just east of the Scottish Water reservoir.

The Scottish Government has received 131 individual representations from third parties as well as a petition with 684 signatories.

Cairngorms National Park Authority, Scottish Natural Heritage, the John Muir Trust and Kirriemuir, Inveresk and Stanley community councils have also objected to the proposal.

Malcolm Connor, of Friends of Backwater and Glens Against Turbines, said: “It is notable that not one single letter of support has been lodged for this application.”

An Eneco spokesperson said: “These concerns have been raised and addressed previously…with Eneco reducing the number and elevation of turbines and designing in a suitable location, water; independent research has taken place and a pollution prevention plan with Scottish water has been put into place.

Source:  By Graeme Strachan | The Courier | 13 May 2015 | www.thecourier.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.