[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

State high court overturns ruling, clears DEP in island wind case  

Credit:  By Stephen Betts, BDN Staff | Bangor Daily News | May 08, 2015 | bangordailynews.com ~~

VINALHAVEN, Maine – The state high court overturned a lower court ruling Thursday that had chastised the Department of Environmental Protection’s commissioner for loosening noise requirements for the island’s wind turbines.

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court ruled that DEP’s decision to enter into an agreement with Fox Islands Wind rather than push for more conditions was supported by substantial evidence and was within the agency’s discretion.

The ruling was a blow to neighbors who had complained that the three nearly 400-foot-tall wind turbines, erected in 2009, were exceeding noise standards.

The ruling overturned a March 2014 ruling by Superior Court Justice Michaela Murphy in Kennebec County. The high court heard arguments on the issue in December.

Murphy had criticized DEP Commissioner Patricia Aho for participating in the department’s handling of the Fox Islands Wind case.

Aho had worked for Pierce Atwood LLC before being appointed deputy DEP commissioner and then acting commissioner on June 20, 2011. Pierce Atwood represents Fox Islands Wind.

Aho overrode DEP staff and an outside consultant’s recommendation 10 days after she became acting commissioner.

“That issue, which could have been avoided, has created an enormous amount of mistrust by the [Fox Islands Wind] neighbors as to whether their grievances can receive fair treatment by the commissioner and the department,” Murphy stated in the conclusion of her 2014 ruling.

The high court, however, found that it was within the DEP’s authority to enter into an agreement with the power utility.

“The petitioners do not complain that DEP refused to take any enforcement action; rather, they complain that DEP’s action did not go far enough. This goes to the essence of prosecutorial discretion: agencies have a great deal of discretion when it comes to enforcement of the laws under their jurisdiction,” the high court ruled.

The high court justices also concluded that the DEP did not violate the neighbors’ First Amendment rights by retaliating against them for complaining about the lack of DEP action. The court did conclude, however, that the court had the authority to review the DEP’s enforcement actions. The DEP had argued at the December hearing before the Supreme Court that the action by the DEP was not reviewable by the court.

The DEP issued a statement Friday indicating it was pleased with the decision that supported the department’s decision and its “substantial work regarding the Fox Islands Wind case.”

Attorney Rufus Brown, who represented the neighbors, did not return an email request for comment on Friday.

Source:  By Stephen Betts, BDN Staff | Bangor Daily News | May 08, 2015 | bangordailynews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:

Tag: Complaints


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: