Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Unintended victims
Credit: Letter: Unintended victims | The Pueblo Chieftain | May 2, 2015 | www.chieftain.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
In a recent editorial on the rejection of a proposed wind farm in Huerfano County, it was stated that there is no negative environmental impact with wind energy (“PUC must reconsider,” April 15). I feel this statement requires clarification.
Negative effects of wind turbines on bird and bat populations and their habitats are serious and require attention. The risks associated with direct turbine strikes are real. Turbine blades are as long as the wingspan of a 737 jet and consequently kill eagles, songbirds and bats, many of which belong to endangered species.
To be a truly ‘green’ source of energy, wind power needs to employ careful siting, operation, monitoring and the adoption of newer, safer turbine designs that may pose less of a risk to eagles, other birds and bats.
Our society needs more low-carbon, renewable energy. But it must be developed in ways that minimize wildlife mortality and reduce habitat loss.
Dr. Peg Rooney
President
Arkansas Valley Audubon Society
Penrose
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: