[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Developers withdraw 86m wind turbine bid in Bodham, near Holt  

Credit:  Eastern Daily Press | 28 April 2015 | www.edp24.co.uk ~~

Developers behind a wind turbine proposal in north Norfolk have withdrawn a bid to build an 86m structure.

An application for a smaller 66m turbine was turned down by planners at North Norfolk District Council last month, and developers are considering an appeal.

But a planning inquiry for the larger turbine, which had been subject to a long-running legal battle going as far as the High Court, had been planned for July.

However David Mack, of green-energy developers Genatec, said the company had decided to focus on the smaller turbine, which it believed had more chance of success, and had cancelled the inquiry.

He said: “The site has a great wind speed which means it is viable.

“We are going to keep going with it as it is energy which will be used locally.”

He added: “We are still very confident it will go through.”

Mr Mack added the smaller turbine would have less of an impact, and claimed improvements in technology meant it would power almost as many homes as the larger development, which it was hoped would power 600 homes.

The proposal of a turbine at the rural farm has sparked a campaign of objection from nearby homeowners, who said it would have a negative impact on the countryside and Area Of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

An action group, No To That Turbine, claimed the turbine would slash property values and damage the tourist industry.

Mr Mack said the company had taken account of people’s views and had designed the site around that.

He added: “One of the concerns of the local people was about noise. This one is less noisy than the larger one.”

A spokesman for the council said the withdrawal positive, as it meant a costly inquiry could be avoided.

Source:  Eastern Daily Press | 28 April 2015 | www.edp24.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.