[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Endangered turtles win turbine reprieve 

Credit:  By Colin Perkel, The Canadian Press | April 20, 2015 | www.northbaynipissing.com ~~

TORONTO – A review tribunal found correctly that a proposed wind turbine project on the shore of Lake Ontario would devastate a population of already endangered turtles, Ontario’s top court ruled Monday.

At the same time, the Court of Appeal said the tribunal needs to take another look at whether there might be ways to deal with the potential harm to the Blanding’s turtle other than by scuttling the project entirely.

“I would allow the appeal on the merits and restore the tribunal’s conclusion that the project will cause serious and irreversible harm to the Blanding’s turtle,” Justice Russell Juriansz wrote on behalf of the court.

“I would remit the matter back to the tribunal to address remedy after giving the parties the opportunity to be heard.”

At issue in the case, which is being closely watched for its ramifications on how endangered species and unspoiled areas are protected, is a provincially approved nine-turbine wind farm on 324 hectares at Ostrander Point south of Belleville, Ont.

The Prince Edward County Field Naturalists Club successfully challenged the approval before the environmental review tribunal based on expert views that the project would harm the area’s turtles. Among other things, experts testified that access roads needed for the turbines would mean increased traffic that would further threaten the turtles.

Ostrander Point Wind Energy, the turbine proponents, turned successfully to Divisional Court, which restored the original approval, prompting the field naturalists to head to the Court of Appeal.

In its decision, the Appeal Court said the tribunal had properly weighed the expert opinions and other evidence in siding with the naturalists, and the Divisional Court was wrong to find otherwise.

The field naturalists were thrilled with the ruling.

“We are finally vindicated in showing that the environment matters,” said spokeswoman Cheryl Anderson.

Nature Canada, which intervened in the appeal, called the ruling “a huge win for nature.”

“Other proposed wind projects will need to consider impacts on birds and bats as well as turtles much more seriously than they have done previously, especially where proposed wind project road networks fragment habitat for species at risk,” Stephen Hazell, a lawyer with the group, said in a statement.

However, the top court also found that the tribunal unfairly denied Ostrander a chance to show that closing the access roads to the public would mitigate the risk to the turtles.

The Appeal Court refused Ostrander’s request to approve the project, saying the review tribunal was the appropriate forum to hear those submissions.

“That the tribunal will allow the project to proceed upon the roads closure should not be regarded as a foregone conclusion,” Juriansz said.

“I note the tribunal had evidence of how the proposed access roads would cause harm to the turtle’s habitat quite apart from collisions with motor vehicles.”

Anderson said the eco group was confident it can convince the tribunal that Ostrander’s idea of putting up gates to close off the roads is no solution.

“The remedy is no roads,” she said.

Ostrander did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

Source:  By Colin Perkel, The Canadian Press | April 20, 2015 | www.northbaynipissing.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky