[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm plan stifled 

Credit:  By Peter Roper | The Pueblo Chieftain | Published April 18, 2015 | www.chieftain.com ~~

The Colorado Public Utilities Commission refused to change its mind this week about Black Hills Energy’s request to build a 60-megawatt wind farm in Huerfano County.

The three commissioners – Joshua Epel, Pamela Patton and Glenn Vaad – said Black Hills was using an unrealistic forecast for natural gas prices when it projected that the wind farm could save ratepayers $113 million over 25 years.

The utility, along with its supporters, wanted the commission to reconsider its February ruling against the wind farm plan.

During a two-hour meeting Thursday afternoon, the commissioners repeated their objections, but added other reasons as well in turning away the project.

The PUC has been the target of unhappy Pueblo ratepayers in recent years for approving a series of Black Hills rate increases. And the commission statement after Thursday’s meeting seemed written with those Pueblo ratepayers in mind.

The commissioners claimed the proposed 34-tower wind project could cost as much as $246 million to ratepayers over time – not the $113 million in long-term savings that Black Hills and its supporters, such as Western Resource Advocates, claim.

Epel called the Black Hills estimates “unrealistic.” The commission also said the wind farm request was coming on the heels of the PUC’s “reluctant” decision in December to let Black Hills add a $70 million turbine to its Pueblo Airport Generating Station.

The main issue appeared to be the long-term natural gas price forecast that Black Hills submitted in its the request.

Gwen Farnsworth, an energy analyst for Western Resources, said the Black Hills forecast used the specific model required by the PUC. Instead, the commissioners appeared to rely on a price forecast from Xcel Energy.

Bret Jones, spokesman for the utility, confirmed Farnsworth’s account of the meeting – particularly the debate of gas price forecasts – but said Black Hills wouldn’t have a formal comment until the commissioners release their written decision, which should be coming soon.

Source:  By Peter Roper | The Pueblo Chieftain | Published April 18, 2015 | www.chieftain.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky