[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Backwater Reservoir windfarm plan draws fire from leading charities  

Credit:  By Richard Watt, 8 April 2015, thecourier.co.uk ~~

Backwater Reservoir. DC Thomson

Backwater Reservoir. DC Thomson

The UK’s leading wild land conservation charity has criticised plans to build a windfarm on the edge of Perthshire.

Developer Eneco UK submitted an application for 18 turbines between Glen Prosen and Glen Isla, each 125 metres in height, to the Scottish Government in January.

The proposed 59MW Macritch Hill development is intended for Scottish Water land at Backwater Reservoir.

But the John Muir Trust has claimed the development will negatively affect the Cairngorms National Park if it goes ahead.

John Low of the trust, based in Pitlochry, said it does not support “industrial-scale wind energy developments” on wild land.

“We are seriously concerned about the cumulative impact of the proposed development,” he said.

“The John Muir Trust believes that the Macritch windfarm would have a significant and detrimental effect both in terms of combined visibility and sequential impact.

“No matter what they do a development of this scale will have a major visual impact.

“The Statue of Liberty is 93 metres high; if I was to suggest that putting 18 of them in this area would have a negligible additional impact on the landscape, I don’t think my view would be given any credence.”

The trust states other developments in the area include the operational Drumderg (16 turbines), application-stage Tullymurdoch (seven) and Saddle Hill (14), while Green Burn at Drumfork is at the scoping stage.

Eneco UK had scaled back earlier plans for up to 33 turbines along the water and the firm believes the windfarm would help reduce the utilities giant’s electricity bill by generating 138 Gigawatt hours of electricity each year.

A spokesman for Eneco UK said: “Following public consultation, Eneco has reduced the number of turbines from 33 to 18.

“Eneco has moved the turbines from the hilltops and designed the windfarm development in a valley that has already seen human intervention.

“This means that the Macritch Hill Wind Farm will have almost no visibility from the core of the national park, and will have little scope to interact with any other consented or proposed windfarms in the area.”

Known as Macritch Hill after the 475-metre elevation to the east of Backwater Reservoir, the project will stand on 1,200 hectares of shore-side land at the 397-metre Little Ley.

Eneco was awarded the rights to explore the development in 2012, and has since undertaken an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and technical surveys to determine the scale and design of the proposed windfarm.

Eneco states that a series of consultations have also been carried out in the community.

Other Eneco UK projects include the operational Tullo and Twinshiels windfarms (42MW) in Laurencekirk and Lochluichart (69MW) in the Highlands, while Highland developments Burn of Whilk and Moy are both under construction.

The objection follows that of Stewart Miller from the International Raptor Research and Conservation, who claimed a “baseline bird study” conducted by the developer did not go far enough in analysing local bird populations and their risk.

Eneco UK rebuffed his claims, and considers there would be “no adverse effect” on species.

Mr Miller said: “The data provided by the vantage point surveys and flight-line records show that this development will kill geese and a variety of raptor species such as osprey, golden eagle, goshawk, peregrine falcon and, potentially, merlin and white-tailed eagles.

“The above are species included in the list of target species for the site. However, it should also be noted that short-eared owls, hen harriers, buzzards, kestrels and sparrowhawks have been excluded.”

Mr Miller said that the company’s 13-month survey was too short, adding: “This is not a long enough period to give an accurate survey result and therefore is incomplete.”

Source:  By Richard Watt, 8 April 2015, thecourier.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.