[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

No appeal against refused Northumberland windfarm plan  

Credit:  By James Willoughby | Northumberland Gazette | 22 March 2015 | www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk ~~

The company behind a controversial plan to build five wind turbines in Northumberland has said it will not appeal the refused scheme.

In October, Northumberland County Council’s planning and environment committee knocked back RES UK and Ireland Ltd’s bid for the 127-metre-high turbines between Wingates and Netherwitton, known as Rayburn Lake.

The application was hotly-contested, sparking more than 150 objections from residents and a number of parish councils.

It was also recommended for refusal by planning officers, who said it would have a ‘significant and unacceptable adverse impact on visual amenity and on the character of the local landscape’ as well as ‘a significant and unacceptable cumulative adverse impact on the special qualities of the Northumberland National Park’, ‘overbearing and oppressive impacts on Lily Cottage and Holly Lodge’ and ‘a significant and unacceptable impact on the landscape and visual amenity when viewed from Wingates village’.

After the scheme was knocked backed last year, an RES spokesman said that the company was ‘very disappointed’ with the decision and intended to examine the reasons for refusal ‘very carefully’ as it considered its position.

However, RES has now confirmed that it will not be appealing against the county council’s decision to refuse the application. But RES said that it could not guarantee that the site would never be the subject of a future windfarm application.

In a letter from the company, which was this morning tweeted by the Conservative candidate for the Berwick-upon-Tweed constituency Anne-Marie Trevelyan, read: “Following the decision, we have reviewed the planning committee’s reasons for refusal in some detail and discussed the options for the site with our joint-venture partner BT. We are writing to advise you that, following the review, RES and BT have decided not to appeal this decision.

“While we continue to believe that the site has many positive attributes for renewable-energy generation, including excellent wind speeds and a good transportation route, anticipated upgrades to the grid network near Blyth have not progressed as anticipated and alternative connections have not been forthcoming.

“This, coupled with other considerations, has led to our decision not to pursue plans for Rayburn windfarm any further.

“While we cannot guarantee that the site will never be the subject of a windfarm application by RES or another developer in the future, we can confirm that RES and BT will not be appealing this refusal.”

The company adds that, if the scheme had progressed, it would have been capable of generating sufficient renewable electricity to meet the needs of around 6,500 homes and would have delivered community and economic benefits to the region of at least £2.6million over its lifetime.

Source:  By James Willoughby | Northumberland Gazette | 22 March 2015 | www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.