[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Analysis: IRS grants developers an extra 12 months  

Credit:  18 March 2015 by Diane Bailey | Windpower Monthly | www.windpowermonthly.com ~~

A decision by the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to give wind developers an extra year to bring projects online and still collect the $0.023/kWh production tax credit (PTC) sets the stage for two years of robust growth in the US market.

The US Congress passed a retroactive one-year extension of the PTC in December, allowing projects that were able to start construction before the end of 2014 – either by spending 5% of total project costs or starting actual physical work on the project – to qualify for the credit.

But until the IRS released its new guidance in March, projects had to be online by the end of this year in order to avoid scrutiny and risk not receiving the credit. The tax agency’s decision to extend that commissioning deadline to the end of 2016 allows developers, especially those who moved to qualify an estimated 7GW of new projects in the last few weeks of 2014, more time to finish development work and find buyers for their power.

Like most major US developers, RES Americas used the short window of opportunity between the extension of the PTC in mid-December and its expiry at the end of the same month to set new projects in motion.

“We really had to move quickly in December and managed to qualify another 800MW to 1,000MW,” Rob Morgan, the company’s chief strategy officer, said in February at Infocast’s wind power finance and investment summit in San Diego. “We think this is now all about getting the power purchase agreements (PPAs) for those qualified projects figured out.”

Elusive power purchase contracts

Finding those PPAs is getting harder, panelists agreed, and the tight timelines add to the difficulty. “I think offtake agreements are the primary challenge to realising a lot of the pipeline in the market,” said Tim Howell, managing director for power and renewable energy at GE Energy Financial Services.

The challenge should focus a lot of activity on Texas, one of the only places in the US where it is possible to build projects without a long-term power purchase contract. Developers in the state are able sign hedge contracts with banks or commodity trading houses that stabilise cash flows enough to attract project financing by guaranteeing a price for at least a portion of the project’s output.

“We’re all searching for PPAs or offtake agreements with commercial and industrial customers in markets all over the US. But as the clock begins ticking, maybe there aren’t enough of those deals, and you still have a turbine overhang, it’s simply easier to do a hedge deal in Texas,” said Shalini Ramanathan, vice-president of origination at RES Americas.

Financing could also raise some hurdles. Most developers need to find investors that have a large enough tax bill to actually make use of the PTC, and Burton says the supply of tax equity is barely keeping up with demand. “We have a few more tax equity investors than we had a few years ago, but we also have a lot more projects.”

The fast-growing solar market in the US also requires tax equity, and competition is expect to heat up as that industry nears the expiry of its own tax subsidies at the end of 2016. “Next year will be an absolute crunch year with the solar guys pushing to reach completion of their projects before year end, so there will be a lot of people crowding in for tax equity,” Keith Martin, a partner in law firm Chadbourne and Parke, told Infocast delegates.

But Howell, whose company is a major player in the tax-equity market, thinks the money will be there when it is needed. “Good project will attract tax equity capital,” he said.

Source:  18 March 2015 by Diane Bailey | Windpower Monthly | www.windpowermonthly.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.