[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Glenkerie extension appeal 

Credit:  Peeblesshire News | 17 Mar 2015 | www.peeblesshirenews.com ~~

An energy development firm has lodged an appeal over a decision to refuse an extension to a remote wind farm near Broughton.

Infinis wanted to stretch its 11-turbine Glenkerie Wind Farm into a neighbouring valley with additional turbines.

Although the application for the six 100-metre high structures won favour with officials at Scottish Borders Council it was eventually rejected by councillors on the planning committee.

Lady Pamela Strachan, who is the wife of Lord Lieutenant Sir Hew Strachan, delivered a damning verdict against the application during November’s meeting.

Lady Strachan told the committee: “In contrast the turbines that are already there, these will be 110 metres higher and will be a great intrusion on the valley.

“The current wind farm is between 100 and 200 metres below the hill line – this cannot be said of the extension.”

Local community councils as well as walkers and hill-runners organisations had also objected to proposals.

And their concerns led to a month-long postponement to allow for further information to be gathered.

When the committee reconvened in December they voted to refuse permission.

Amongst the reasoning for the decision was the impact on the landscape, the intrusion into Glenholm Valley and the proximity and noise nuisance to a property at Glenkirk.

Infinis submitted its appeal this week to the Government’s Directorate for Planning in Falkirk.

A site visit will be conducted over the coming months as well as evidence gathered from both sides of the argument.

A decision on the appeal isn’t expected until late summer.

Source:  Peeblesshire News | 17 Mar 2015 | www.peeblesshirenews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky