[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Senators visiting Portland to check turbines  

Credit:  By Steve Robertson | Portland Observer | Friday 13th March, 2015 | ~~

Six senators representing every Australian state and most of its political parties are expected in Portland on Monday, March 30 to closely examine allegations that wind farm operations are making some people feel sick.

Chaired by Victorian independent senator John Madigan, the Senate Select Committee on Wind Turbines plans to hold hearings either at Portland Golf Club or at Glenelg Shire Portland office. Its agenda and list of invitees is likely to be published next week.

A source in Canberra said senators intend to visit the three Cape Bridgewater homes featured in an acoustic report commissioned by Pacific Hydro and written by researcher Steven Cooper, accompanied by Mr Cooper himself.

Exactly when those Cape Bridgewater visits will happen is not likely to be announced publicly.

The committee consists of:

• John Madigan (chair), Independent, Victoria;
• Bob Day (deputy chair), Family First, SA;
• Chris Back, Liberal, WA;
• Matthew Canavan, Nationals, QLD;
• David Leyonhjelm, Liberal Democrat, NSW (former Heywood resident); and
• Anne Urquhart, Labor, Tasmania

At Senate Estimates this month, Senator Madigan quizzed Clean Energy Finance Corporation chief executive officer Oliver Yates about wind farm operations at Cape Bridgewater.

Senator Madigan: “Recent acoustic investigations undertaken at stage two of Pacific Hydro’s Portland project revealed a correlation or a trend between the occurrence of specific infrasound frequency that occurred at various phases of operation at the Cape Bridgewater power generation facility and the residents’ reports of adverse sensation and health effects. This could have ramifications under the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008. If so, would the facility be in breach of conditions relating to its financial arrangements and contractual obligations with the CEFC?”

Mr Yates: “All projects are required to comply with the law. Currently it is dependent upon whatever planning permits or requirements are there at that site. If the project fails to meet its compliance obligations there is typically a right of termination for the funding requirements under the facilities. We do expect people who are borrowing from any financial institution – it is common, whether you are public or private – to use the money in a way which is used for lawful purposes and, if it is not used for lawful purposes, it is unlikely that the money would be available for very long: it would typically be an event of default.”

Source:  By Steve Robertson | Portland Observer | Friday 13th March, 2015 |

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.