[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Make sure setbacks are safe  

Credit:  Huron Daily Tribune | Friday, March 6, 2015 | www.michigansthumb.com ~~

Apparently, the diagram that appeared in the Huron Daily Tribune has caused controversy. The article stated it was misinformation but would it have been so controversial – or even published – if one word would have been added?

When referring to parcels A, B, C, D and E, the diagram should have stated “he can no longer safely build within this circle.”

The County Master Plan’s purpose is to protect the health, safety and welfare of all Huron County residents. That is the sworn duty of all public servants.

The wind turbine manufacturer Vestas set safety standards for its maintenance personnel. Their safety manual states: “If a runaway operation should occur, the plant must be evacuated immediately by running upwind, and access to the surrounding area in a radius of at least 500 meters (1,640 feet) must be restricted.” But current Huron County zoning allows turbines to be constructed 1,320 feet from homes. This often turns significant portions of neighboring people’s property into evacuation zones.

The Tribune’s article states: “The zoning ordinance restricts placement of the wind turbine, but it does not restrict from building on their property as long as it complies with the ordinance. They can build there if they chose to.” Jeff Smith said he confirmed this with Steve Allen, the county’s corporate counsel.

Would that include leaseholders and non-leaseholders? If so, do non-leaseholders have to ask the developer’s permission to build on their own land?

Huron County’s wind zoning ordinance obviously contradicts published health, safety and welfare standards and thus places non-leaseholders at risk.

Is there an answer to something of this magnitude? Yes! Re-analyze the present ordinance while under a moratorium and then enact property line setbacks for wind turbines.

Finally, in a county that is mired in wind turbine controversy I believe all constituents should be treated fairly and no one should be referred to as an “anti-wind” constituent.

Louis J. Colletta

Lake Township

Source:  Huron Daily Tribune | Friday, March 6, 2015 | www.michigansthumb.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch