[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Middleton Burn Action Group to fight all ‘inappropriate’ turbines 

Credit:  Berwick Advertiser | Sunday 01 March 2015 | www.berwick-advertiser.co.uk ~~

The Middleton Burn Action Group (MBAG) has extended its remit to oppose any commercial wind turbine in north Northumberland.

The group, originally set up in 2011 to fight the proposed 14-turbine Middleton Burn development, agreed to amend its constitution at its fourth AGM on Friday.

It now stands to oppose the Middleton Burn Wind Farm proposal and “any other wind turbine proposal in the local area”, other than farm or residential turbines for self generation.

The change is in response to the submission of planning applications for various large, single turbines in the area, including at Adderstone Mains and South Charlton.

MBAG chairman Chris Craddock explained: “The group was initially set up to oppose the Middleton Burn proposal and constituted to fight that and ‘any other wind farm proposal in the local area’.

“However the developers now realise that any new proposals for multiple turbines would be very difficult and that it would seem easier to go for large ‘singletons’ on the local farms. This is now a growing threat that can be seen as you travel the A1.

“Planning is also now in for huge turbines at Adderstone Mains and South Charlton, mere yards from the main trunk road.”

He added: “The group are not against farm or residential turbines for self generation, only those that are clearly designed to generate huge cash subsidies rather than power!”

Mr Craddock’s report outlined the activities of the committee and members throughout the year and the successes they had brought.

The most notable of these, he said, was the unanimous refusal for the nine-turbine Belford Burn scheme, proposed by German firm EnegieKontor but refused by Northumberland County Council.

However, he warned, that the ‘battle’ was not yet over as Energiekontor still had time to appeal the decision or submit a revised application.

He also advised members to be on standby for early action should an application from Danish-owned Air Farmers Ltd for the Middleton Burn scheme, which had been expected early this year, be submitted.

Source:  Berwick Advertiser | Sunday 01 March 2015 | www.berwick-advertiser.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky